The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] Creating default object from empty value - Line: 11 - File: inc/plugins/tapatalk.php PHP 7.4.10 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/plugins/tapatalk.php 11 errorHandler->error
/inc/class_plugins.php 38 require_once
/inc/init.php 233 pluginSystem->load
/global.php 18 require_once
/showthread.php 28 require_once





Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Found original part?
#11
(05-28-2016, 05:07 PM)kresty Wrote: So if you're rebuilding the cell block camera prop are you going to go all pyro and blow up your replica? ;-)

Nice idea, but it can´t happen. Angel

First - when wearing the armor i would be a Stormtrooper, not Han Solo. And Lord Vader is not the most understanding boss when someone damages imperial property.

Second - we all know imperial Stormtroopers arn´t able to hit a house that´s 10m away, so there is no chance to hit something that´s smaller than a shoebox.

Smile
Reply
#12
Ah, I thought maybe there were 6 of them so that the stormtroopers would have a bigger target - and figured that it'd be collateral damage while you were trying to zap Han.

(05-29-2016, 02:24 AM)Lichtbringer Wrote:
(05-28-2016, 05:07 PM)kresty Wrote: So if you're rebuilding the cell block camera prop are you going to go all pyro and blow up your replica? ;-)

Nice idea, but it can´t happen.  Angel

First - when wearing the armor i would be a Stormtrooper, not Han Solo. And Lord Vader is not the most understanding boss when someone damages imperial property.

Second - we all know imperial Stormtroopers arn´t able to hit a house that´s 10m away, so there is no chance to hit something that´s smaller than a shoebox.

Smile
Reply
#13
I believe you have to proove you´re one of the worst shooters in the galaxy to be part of the white bobbleheads. Wink
Reply
#14
OK, new pics with measurements (but in no kind of order).

[Image: normal_20160529_171820_zpsxyy9vaji.jpg]


[Image: normal_20160529_171833_zpsgggxpdxc.jpg]

[Image: normal_20160529_171904_zpsjnlrduky.jpg]

[Image: normal_20160529_171924_zpsthlqiy1k.jpg]

[Image: normal_20160529_171937_zps0darufa2.jpg]

[Image: normal_20160529_171956_zpswgv9kkai.jpg]

[Image: normal_20160529_172007_zpsry19t6yz.jpg]
Reply
#15
More:

[Image: normal_20160529_172022_zpsizsz5gyl.jpg]

[Image: normal_20160529_172044_zps8mt5zt1v.jpg]

[Image: normal_20160529_172100_zpsub2g8iph.jpg]

[Image: normal_20160529_172129_zpseuxtfg20.jpg]

[Image: normal_20160529_172139_zps9p7xirll.jpg]

[Image: normal_20160529_172149_zpsqihimxj3.jpg]

[Image: normal_20160529_172220_zps1jvq6tzn.jpg]

[Image: normal_20160529_172236_zps6hqqqz0w.jpg]
Reply
#16
And more:

[Image: normal_20160529_172250_zps9cyomvri.jpg]

[Image: normal_20160529_172533_zpsexhrvudv.jpg]



The glass lens is pretty massive, and i have no idea ho to measure the curve.

[Image: normal_20160529_172504_zpstdpxbqz4.jpg]

[Image: normal_20160529_172510_zps15psf440.jpg]



That´s it, i hope i have everything. If any other dims were needed, let me know.

And after you picked them, please let me know, as i want to delete them then from my photobucket, to keep a better general overview.
Reply
#17
Okay, first off . ..

These are totally AWESOME!! Thank you very much!!

Secondly, the first two images are the same. Was that accidental? Is there another image that we're not seeing (replaced by the repeat) or all they all here, just one of them twice?

lastly . . . I would be thrilled to host these images here in the galleries, if that would be all right. That way you don't have to have them in your photobucket. However, I can't download them. If I try, when I try to open them I get an error that the file is corrupt.
Reply
#18
Be my guest.  Blush

No idea if i messed or doubled it, will have to check when i´m home from work, not sure if i get that done today.

Strange - i tried and i can download them under "save as". Maybe it works directly? http://s527.photobucket.com/user/Lichtbo...t=3&page=1

If not, let me know and i mail them to any adress you give me.  Smile
Reply
#19
*heads to Ebay*
100% death proof

[Image: qBQpDd.jpg]
Reply
#20
More information (sorta) on this piece.  (Maybe this sorta stuff should go on the wiki?)


I did some research. As Lichtbringer has already told us this part comes from the Paterson Trident hand held slide viewer.  It's an inside secondary lens that is accessible when  you open the back/bottom of the viewer to access the battery compartment


[Image: normal_Paterson_inside.JPG]

You can see the lens in question in place there just below the hinges. 

Paterson also sold another model of slide viewer, the Viscount. It seems a strange coincidence that it would share the name as the plane the Astromech Holo Projectors come from.  The Viscount looks, at least at first glance, identical to the Trident with the exception of being molded it green.


[Image: normal_viscount.jpg]

These Viscounts are more common, at least here in the states, and can be had for fewer dollars than you usually pay for a Trident.

They aren't, however, as similar to the Trident as they seem. First and foremost, they don't have the inner lens we're interested in for the Treadwell.


[Image: normal_Paterson_Visount_inside.JPG]

A printed insert that comes with the Viscount does refer to an inner lens for increased magnification that comes in the "Special Model" but it is unclear if the lens is the one in question or not. The description of their being two grooves that the lens slips into implies not.  You can click on the above image for a larger version where you can faintly see the engraved positions the text refers to and the grooves on side of the inside of the shell.  It looks like this additional lens serves the same purpose as the lens we're looking for, it's just implemented differently in the Viscount than it is in the Trident.


[Image: ViscountInsertSpecialLens.jpg]

In addition, for someone planning on building an accurate version of the Detention Block camera array, there are differences as well.  The Trident has a curve to the lip extending in front of the main viewing lens, the Viscount's is straight, and there are two straight flanges on the bottom of the Trident that the Viscount lacks. It actually appears that those flanges are directly related to our treadwell eye lens on the inside of the device.  And most importantly it appears that the Viscount has a smaller front lens, which would change the look significantly.  

All of the Trident images in this post are now in the reference gallery. All of the Viscount images including the complete text of the printed insert (as I didn't want to include incorrect reference in the treadwell album) are in my personal gallery in the Random Stuff album.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)